Is Claiming Your Pet as a Tax Dependent Possible?
If you’ve ever scrutinized your pet's vet bills, grooming fees, daycare costs, and specialty food expenses and thought, “This pet definitely qualifies as my dependent,” you're not alone. Remarkably, a New York attorney is pursuing this very argument in federal court.
In December 2025, attorney Amanda Reynolds filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against the IRS, seeking legal recognition of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a dependent for federal tax purposes.
This case is both unusual and thought-provoking, mirroring a question many taxpayers wrestle with annually: Can pet expenses qualify for deductions? And if not, what prevents this?
Let’s delve into this unprecedented lawsuit, current tax law standings, and explore instances where the IRS does allow tax provisions for animals.
The Legal Battle: “My Dog Qualifies as a Dependent”
Reynolds asserts in her lawsuit that Finnegan fulfills IRS criteria for dependents because:
he resides with her full-time,
he lacks personal income, and
she covers over half of his annual expenses (exceeding $5,000 in areas like food, healthcare, and daycare).
As reported in a national news outlet, Reynolds provocatively claims, “For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is akin to a daughter, certainly a ‘dependent,’” within her court filing.
Adding a constitutional dimension, Reynolds argues that the current regulations unjustifiably discriminate against dependents based on “species,” citing Equal Protection, and contends the lack of tax consideration as an improper “taking” under the Fifth Amendment.
Current Status of the Case
The litigation resides in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Presently, proceedings are paused due to a federal magistrate's approval of a motion to stay discovery, pending the IRS's motion to dismiss.
A court order acknowledges the lawsuit’s “novel yet pressing question” regarding whether domestic animals could be classified as “dependents” under tax codes. Nonetheless, this document also signals substantial challenges ahead, indicating the government's perspective that these claims appear “baseless on their face” and unlikely to withstand dismissal motions.
In summary: this lawsuit is authentic, active, and attracting nationwide attention, although judicial skepticism remains concerning its prospects for success.
Tax Law: Why Pets Aren’t Classified as Dependents
The crux of the legal challenge is that tax legislation precisely categorizes dependents as “individuals.”
Under Internal Revenue Code Section 152, a dependent is referenced as a “qualifying child” or “qualifying relative,” where the statute repeatedly employs the term “individual” to denote humans.
Consequently, IRS forms lack any mechanism to declare pets as dependents. Dependents must possess social security or taxpayer identification numbers, with connected tax credits and deductions formulated around human familial ties and domestic relationships.
While Reynolds suggests that Finnegan satisfies the functional dependency criteria (no income, residential status, financial support), an animal as a dependent isn’t aligned under the federal tax code’s definition of an “individual.”
Existing Tax Benefits for Animals
Although routine pet costs are generally non-deductible, there are particular provisions where deductions for animal expenses are possible. This guidance is instrumental for those seeking clarity on practical tax benefits.
1) Service Animals and Medical Deductions
If an animal, specifically a service animal, is trained to assist a disability, associated costs may qualify as medical expenses for itemized deductions.
The IRS outlines that these medical expenditures are deductible if they surpass the applicable AGI threshold. Costs linked to acquiring, training, and maintaining a service animal count as medical expenses when directly related to medical care.
Important Note: Emotional support animals typically do not receive classification as service animals per federal guidelines; service animals perform roles directly associated with a person’s disability.
2) Business Animals and Deductible Business Expenses
In defined conditions, animals engaged in bona fide business activities—such as:
a guard dog safeguarding commercial premises, or
animals fulfilling pest control functions within a business scope.
Certain ongoing costs might be regarded as standard and necessary business expenditures. (Substantiation and a valid business objective remain vital.)
Your document indicates this as one of the constrained scenarios for IRS-approved tax benefits regarding animals.
3) Charitable Deductions via Foster AnimalsTaxpayers fostering animals for verified charities may qualify to deduct some unreimbursed expenses as charitable contributions, subject to meeting stringent documentation and eligibility criteria.
Final Thoughts for Taxpayers
While the lawsuit has an emotionally relatable angle—acknowledging pets as part of the family for many Americans with tangible expenditures—tax law adheres strictly to legislative definitions, devoid of emotion.
Presently:
Claiming a pet as a dependent on federal tax returns isn’t permissible.
Routine pet expenses (like food, grooming, and typical veterinary care) are mostly personal and non-deductible.
Tax deductions based on animals may apply under limited conditions—service animals, certain business-related animals, and in particular instances, foster-related charitable deductions.
As for Reynolds’ legal pursuit, it’s intriguing to observe—not due to prevailing expectations of the IRS embracing golden retriever dependents, but because it underscores the significant role of pets in household reliance, and the blunt divide tax policy maintains between “family” and “property.”
Ultimately, it serves as a pivotal reminder: before assuming deductions apply, always verify the IRS's official stance on what’s recognized and what isn’t.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.
We care about the protection of your data.