Every February, the Super Bowl commands the world’s stage, drawing in millions of fans for the touchdowns, the high-budget commercials, and the halftime spectacle. However, following Super Bowl LX in 2026, a different kind of headline emerged from the sidelines. It wasn’t about a missed pass or a controversial call, but rather the staggering tax bill handed to quarterback Sam Darnold. His experience serves as a high-profile case study in the complexities of location-based income and state tax apportionment.
As the Seattle Seahawks secured their victory over the New England Patriots, the financial reality for players like Darnold began to set in. Here in Las Vegas, we enjoy the benefits of no state income tax, but for athletes playing in high-tax jurisdictions like California, the math changes drastically. For Darnold, the “win” came with a tax liability that may have actually cost him more than the championship bonus itself.
NFL regulations stipulated that each player on the winning Super Bowl LX roster receive a performance bonus of $178,000. On the surface, that is a significant payday. However, because the game took place in California—a state notorious for its aggressive tax brackets—the players fell under the jurisdiction of the “jock tax.”
This tax isn’t a separate levy but a application of non-resident income rules. It treats out-of-state athletes as temporary employees of the state where the game is played. Taxing authorities calculate this using a “duty-day” formula, which counts every day spent in the state for practices, meetings, and media appearances. When analysts applied this formula to Darnold’s multi-million dollar contract, the results were eye-opening: his estimated California tax liability landed between $200,000 and $249,000.

In some scenarios, this meant Darnold paid roughly $71,000 more in taxes than he actually earned from the game’s winning bonus. While different accounting models yield slightly different totals, the core lesson is clear: when you earn income across state lines, the tax bill can easily outpace the immediate reward.
While the name suggests it only applies to those in jerseys, the “jock tax” is simply the most famous version of non-resident income sourcing. The principle is straightforward: if you perform work within a state’s borders, that state typically wants a piece of the action. This is true whether you are a quarterback in the Super Bowl or a consultant flying into Los Angeles for a week-long project.
For Darnold, his “duty days” included the entire week of preparation leading up to the game. Because his total annual salary is so high, the percentage of his income allocated to those few California days created a massive tax obligation at California’s top marginal rates. This is a common pitfall for high-earning individuals who don’t account for the “nexus” they create when working in various jurisdictions.
You don’t need to be an NFL star to trigger these multi-state tax issues. At our firm, we often work with business owners and self-employed professionals who travel frequently or manage remote teams. You might encounter similar “split-state” tax hurdles if you:
Provide services to clients in states where you don’t reside.
Spend significant time traveling for business development or conferences.
Are a remote worker whose employer is based in a state with different nexus rules.
Many jurisdictions require a non-resident return for even a single day of work. For our clients based here in Nevada, where we have no state income tax, it is especially vital to track work days spent in states like California or New York to avoid surprise audits and penalties.

It wasn’t just the players who faced tax questions this year; many fans did too. Whether it’s a friendly wager or a professional sportsbook bet, gambling winnings are taxable at the federal level. Even if you don’t receive a W-2G form, you are legally required to report those wins as income.
The landscape changed further with the 2025 federal tax overhaul. Starting in 2026, taxpayers are limited in how they deduct losses. Previously, you could often offset 100% of your winnings with documented losses; now, you are generally capped at 90% of your winnings. This change can result in “phantom income,” where you owe taxes on a “gain” even if your net wallet for the year is actually at zero. Staying compliant means keeping meticulous records of every bet placed and every dollar won.
Sam Darnold’s story is an extreme example, but the underlying tax principles apply to many of the clients we serve. Whether you are navigating a multi-state business expansion or trying to minimize your personal tax liability, proactive planning is the only way to avoid the “Super Bowl surprise.”
Our team specializes in one-on-one tax planning and resolution, ensuring that you maximize your deductions while staying fully compliant with the IRS and state authorities. If your business takes you across state lines or you’re dealing with complex income sources, reach out to us for a consultation. We’re here to help you keep more of what you earn, no matter where you do the work.
To truly grasp why the tax bill reached such heights, we have to look at the mechanics of the “duty day” calculation. In the eyes of many state tax agencies, a work day is not just the three hours spent on the field during the broadcast. Instead, it encompasses every moment of professional obligation. This includes mandatory team meetings held at the hotel, walkthroughs at the stadium, and even the media junkets that players are contractually obligated to attend.
For a high-profile event like the Super Bowl, the preparation period often spans over a week. If a player spends ten days in California for the event, and their total season consists of 200 duty days, then 5% of their total annual compensation—not just the Super Bowl bonus—is suddenly subject to California’s top tax bracket, which can exceed 13% for the highest earners. This is how a relatively small bonus triggers a tax liability that encompasses a portion of the athlete's much larger base salary.

This aggressive sourcing of income is not limited to California. Various states have different thresholds for what constitutes “working” within their borders. Some states have a “de minimis” rule, where they won't tax you unless you spend more than a certain number of days or earn more than a certain dollar amount. However, other states have a “first dollar” or “first day” rule. This means the moment you perform a single billable hour of work or attend a business meeting in that state, you have technically triggered a filing requirement.
For business owners in Las Vegas who frequently cross into neighboring states for client meetings or site visits, failing to track these days can lead to significant back taxes and interest if the other state’s revenue department decides to investigate. We often see cases where social media check-ins or travel receipts are used as evidence during residency audits. Because Nevada does not have a state income tax, we don't have a “home state tax credit” to offset what you pay to other states, making every dollar paid to another jurisdiction a direct hit to your bottom line.
The 2025 federal tax overhaul introduced even more layers to this puzzle. With the changes to how state and local taxes are treated on federal returns, the “double taxation” effect has become more pronounced for some. Using a GPS-based travel log or a dedicated calendar for business travel is no longer just a good habit; it is a vital defense mechanism in a modern audit. We encourage our clients to think of these records as a form of financial insurance.
For the self-employed and small business owners we serve, the concept of “nexus” is the bridge between the Sam Darnold story and your own daily operations. Physical nexus is often triggered by having an employee or a physical presence in a state, but economic nexus can be triggered simply by reaching a certain sales volume. If you are a consultant or a digital service provider, your “winnings” from a major contract could be eroded by state taxes you didn't see coming. We look at entity structure—whether an S-Corporation, a C-Corporation, or an LLC is most beneficial—to help mitigate these multi-state impacts.
Proper bookkeeping ensures that when tax season arrives, which we often call the Super Bowl for your books, you aren't blindsided by a liability that exceeds your cash flow. Visibility brings scrutiny; high-earning athletes are easy targets for state revenue departments because their schedules are public record, but data sharing between states is making it easier for them to identify business travelers as well. We focus on personal attention, working one-on-one with you to analyze your travel patterns and income sources. By staying ahead of these regulations, we help you navigate the complexities of the tax code so you can focus on growing your business and enjoying your successes without the looming shadow of an unexpected tax bill. Whether you are preparing for a major business event or just managing your month-to-month filings, our detail-oriented approach ensures that every credit is captured and every liability is minimized.
Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.
We care about the protection of your data.