Understanding Tax Impacts for Scam Losses

Delving into the tax implications of scams and theft losses can be complex in today's evolving legislative landscape. Although recent legislative changes largely restrict casualty and theft losses to those linked to federally declared disasters, alternatives exist for scam victims.

Traditionally, tax laws allowed taxpayers to deduct theft losses not reimbursed by insurance. However, legislative updates in recent years have imposed stricter criteria, generally confining deductions to disaster-related losses. Yet, hope remains—if you've been scammed in a transaction aimed at profit, you may still qualify for a deduction.

According to Internal Revenue Code Section 165(c)(2), losses from profit-driven activities might still be deductible. This provision applies when financial losses from scams are related to efforts intending to generate profit, bypassing the need for a disaster declaration. Understanding this tax avenue can provide crucial relief, allowing you to regain some financial stability from scam-induced losses.

Key Criteria for Profit-Driven Theft Losses: To claim a theft loss under the profit-motivation exception, several specifications must be met:

Profit Intent: The transaction's main objective must be economic gain. The IRS requires clear evidence proving the transaction was pursued with profit expectations. Case law and IRS rulings underscore the need for substantial documentation supporting this profit focus.
Eligible Transaction Types: Traditional investments like securities, real estate, or other income-generating activities often qualify. Social or personal transactions without a profit motive typically don't qualify for deductions.
Loss Nature: The loss should directly correlate with the intended profit-focused transaction, demonstrable through financial and legal documentation. Investment scams or fraudulent financial schemes often meet this criterion.

Understanding IRS Guidelines: Deduction claims often necessitate reviewing IRS memoranda and rulings for clarity on deductible losses. A recent IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum, CCM 202511015, further explains deductible losses:

Investment Scams: These scams present classic examples where losses, although fraudulent, may be deductible if initiated with a valid profit expectation. Documentation like communications with the scammer, contracts, and proof of monetary transactions serve as validation.
Theft Loss Scrutiny: The IRS requires profit-driven thefts to originate from profit-seeking transactions, excluding personal engagements like casual lending.

Speak to a Tax Expert

Speak to an expert today on how we can help your business

Get Started

Complex Tax Ramifications: Falling victim to scams involving traditional IRA or tax-deferred funds carries notable tax consequences. Withdrawals due to scams are usually taxable, adding the withdrawn amount to your annual taxable income, potentially increasing your tax liability.

Retirement fund withdrawals can also trigger a 10% early withdrawal penalty for those under 59½, adding financial burden. In contrast, Roth IRA withdrawals are less penalizing, provided contributions adhere to the five-year rule, allowing tax- and penalty-free withdrawals. However, early withdrawal of earnings for non-qualifying reasons may incur taxes and penalties.

Illustrative Examples and Their Tax Implications:

Example 1: Impersonator Scam - Deductible Loss

Taxpayer 1 was deceived by an impersonator claiming to be a “fraud specialist,” prompting fund transfers from IRA and non-IRA accounts to scam-controlled accounts overseas.

Taxer Implications:

Deductions possible if itemizing on Schedule A.
Taxable traditional IRA distributions apply. The 10% early withdrawal penalty holds for those under age 59.5.
Potential recovery through IRA fund re-roll within 60 days, subject to qualifications, which may mitigate penalties.

Example 2: Romance Scam - Non-Deductible Loss

Taxpayer 2 believed in a relationship-based scam, transferring funds overseas driven by compassion rather than profit intent, disqualifying deductions.

Taxer Implications:

No casualty loss deduction available.
Taxable IRA distributions apply. No exemptions from the 10% early withdrawal penalty.
The 60-day IRA fund re-roll option may offer relief.

Example 3: Kidnapping Scam - Non-Deductible Loss

Taxpayer 3 fell prey to a fake kidnapping scam. Without a profit motive, losses are nondeductible, mimicking Example 2 tax implications.

Implications: These cases highlight the necessity of assessing transaction motives to qualify scam-related deductions. Maintain detailed intent documentation, especially for investment contexts, to uphold future profit claims. Furthermore, compliance with enhanced IRS scrutiny is vital, distinguishing between qualified and non-qualified losses.

We advise reaching out to our office for guidance on suspicious communications, especially before authorizing transfers. Education and proactive discussions about scam awareness within your family, especially with seniors, can prevent losses and provide essential support for victims. This proactive defense protects assets and ensures peace of mind.

Speak to a Tax Expert

Speak to an expert today on how we can help your business

Get Started

Share this article...

Facebook

Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.